• Days of Our Lives

    October 2017
    S M T W T F S
    « Jan    
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  
  • Categories

  • History of the Seven Hills

  • Administration

  • Blog Stats

    • 14,646 hits

It’s A Clinton Comedy in New Hampshire – Video Footage

Hillary,

“What a long strange trip it’s been”

Advertisements

Freedom of Speech, Just Watch What You Say With Hillary Clinton

During a Hillary speech in Los Angeles, a heckler/protester from Cindy Sheehan’s CODE PINK was doing what he probably learned to do in college, protest. Hillary could not take this guy shouting out her faults, so she snaps out at him with the sneering attitude of a privileged high school snob. The funny thing is this guy, being a member of CODE PINK is probably a liberal and probably a likely voter. If she is shouting down liberals at her speeches what is she going to do as President to the rest of the country? Check out the video…

Hillary just can’t do anything right with a “conspiracy” coming at her from the right and now one from the left too? Paranoid much?

WoW! If Hillary’s supporters want this, what will she do?

                                                                      hillary-witch.jpg

If anything was obvious in Tuesday’s Democrat debate, it was that Hillary Clinton seethed with anger. She was visibly angry and the inflection and tone in her voice attested to it. Judging by first hand accounts of various advisers and officials close to the Clintons over the years, I would expect that some volunteer had to be the one grabbing their ankles Tuesday night.

To those who have actually listened to former associates of the Clintons, Hillary’s anger is nothing new. To those who are “new” to the Hillary experience and have chosen to not see her as she has always been, was Tuesday a wake up call?

Are some of the people who were Hillary supporters before the debate, at least a tiny bit hesitant about her being an emotional Kilauea? We worry about regular schmoes in everyday life who walk around with a smile on their face while the blood coursing through their veins is a cool 300 degrees. Why not worry about someone who has these characteristics and is running for President? I certainly do.

Hillary supporters don’t seem to mind their candidate being slightly unhinged though. Of course, it’s not their candidate who is the problem, it’s the guy who asked her a question, the guy who called her on something she had said, Tim Russert’s fault. The blame always lies with others on the Hillary campaign trail. One Hillary supporter, who participated in a Wednesday conference call with the campaign made her intentions known. According to The Hill.Com,

Another said Russert “should be shot,” before quickly adding that she shouldn’t say that on a conference call.

When you have supporters who have feelings like that, watch out my friend! The best part about Hillary’s meltdown in front of the country, is that she HAS done this before, but she has always done it behind closed doors, now it won’t be so easy to hide that wicked witch like anger she has been bottling up for awhile. We all know what happens when people bottle up their anger, the pressure build until it can’t be held in any longer and we see complete meltdown.

The cool thing is, Hillary will probably be the Democratic nominee and she will be hopefully facing more folks like a Tim Russert, who do not hold back on any candidate, Republican or Democrat. We need people to ask the tough questions and then continue to hammer that nail if they see where someone tries to get away with being on both sides of an issue. 

In closing, watch out for Hillary supporters out there, they just might think you need to be shot. 

Quoting The Candidates – Clinton

                                                                      digging for gold

Russert: Senator Clinton, I just want to make sure of what I heard. Do you, the New York senator, Hillary Clinton, support the New York governor’s plan to give illegal immigrants a driver’s license?You told the New Hampshire paper that it made a lot of sense. Do you support his plan?

Clinton: You know, Tim, this is where everybody plays “gotcha.” It makes a lot of sense. What is the governor supposed to do? He is dealing with a serious problems. We have failed. And George Bush has failed. Do I think this is the best thing for any governor to do? No. But do I understand the sense of real desperation, trying to get a handle on this? Remember, in New York, we want to know who’s in New York. We want people to come out of the shadows. He’s making an honest effort to do it. We should have passed immigration reform.


No Senator Clinton, this is not where everyone plays “gotcha”, this is where everyone calls you on something you said and you get defensive about it because now it makes you look bad.

Another good quote within this quote is,

“What is the governor supposed to do? He is dealing with a serious problems.”

You mean the Senator from New York and aspiring presidential candidate doesn’t know how to answer the immigration problem, she does not have a plan for immigration?

Maybe, Senator Clinton, just maybe, you could stand outside your New York residence and yell “Whooo Pig Sooooeee” and that might just do the trick for you.

Quoting The Candidates – Clinton

“So when I was born, she called me Hillary, and she always told me it’s because of Sir Edmund Hillary” – The New York Times 04/03/95

Apparently Senator Clinton was never intelligent enough to figure out that Edmund Hillary was a beekeeper and explorer in New Zealand the year she was born. He didn’t become famous until five years later (1953) when he scaled Everest. Fact Checking 101? Not with this candidate.

Why The Hillary-Media Matters Connection Is No Shocker

I begin this post knowing that people are ready to refute it with the argument that Media Matters for America exposed a phony soldier hating Rush Limbaugh. That’s fine, brainwashed people do what they do.

Media Matters For America is an organization that exists to stifle the conservative movement while furthering their own “progressive” agenda. This should be accepted by all before they even go into a conversation about the group. If you don’t accept this, you now have a right to stop reading.

Navigating to the “about us” tab of their homepage tells the story,

Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.

Launched in May 2004, Media Matters for America put in place, for the first time, the means to systematically monitor a cross section of print, broadcast, cable, radio, and Internet media outlets for conservative misinformation — news or commentary that is not accurate, reliable, or credible and that forwards the conservative agenda — every day, in real time.

Using the website http://www.mediamatters.org as the principal vehicle for disseminating research and information, Media Matters posts rapid-response items as well as longer research and analytic reports documenting conservative misinformation throughout the media. Additionally, Media Matters works daily to notify activists, journalists, pundits, and the general public about instances of misinformation, providing them with the resources to rebut false claims and to take direct action against offending media institutions.

Now that we know what Media Matters for America claims to stand for, we can engage in a more productive dialog about them. First and foremost, I am an unwavering supporter of the First Amendment. I believe that everyone has the right to say whatever they want, about whoever they want, anytime they want. I also believe that people should understand that even though they have a right to say anything, they also need to be ready to accept the consequences of their words.

In the effort of furthering their agenda, Media Matters took a conversation by Rush Limbaugh, applied their “about us” policy to it and reported their interpretation of what Limbaugh’s thought process and his meaning were. Fine, after all we have the First Amendment. Now the pseudo David Brock’s of the world and the real David Brock for that matter, are unhinged at the backlash that is just beginning to encircle the “progressive” group.

Limbaugh’s statement, interpreted through the eyes and mouths of a group whose major purpose is to further the “progressive” movement, sounds bad. Limbaugh’s statement taken in context sounds right on. Calling people who have made up lies about military operations and otherwise faked an entire military career, phony soldiers, is anything but misleading or a falsehood. The real issue is that the liberals and democrats are pretty much reeling after the Petraeus report and the fact that between the Democrat’s take over of congress and now, Pelosi, Reid & Co. have managed to amass a whopping 11% approval rating.

11%, man that means 89% of the people polled disagree with the Democrat led congress. Now don’t fly off the handle just yet, I am a believer in the fact that the Republicans who have been in control really messed up things as well. They started acting like Democrats and we conservatives didn’t like it.

I bring the Democrat led congress into this solely based on the ties of Hillary Clinton to Media Matters of America. Hillary claims that she started Media Matters for America a claim she makes rather proudly I might add, check it out.

It is very good to know for sure that Hillary started Media Matters. That tidbit of information is significant in that it aligns Media Matters not only with the Democratic party, but with an actual Democratic Senator. Unfortunately for conservative bashing liberals, being a mouthpiece/proponent for a political party negates Media Matters 501(c)(3) status and probably opens up the organization to some new found IRS scrutiny.

It does get more interesting though. Media Matters denies any link to Hillary at all. Now as has been pointed out in the blogosphere, either Hillary is lying or Media Matters is lying. Obviously, Media Matters knows the consequence for being aligned with a political party or a specific politician, so it is easy to see why they would need to lie to protect their agenda in this instance. It also makes it easy to see why they would need to make insidious, out of context accusations about Rush Limbaugh and any other conservative speech, that it interprets as “misinformation”.

Hillary, i’m assuming, wants to further her “progressive” agenda, why not create a proxy to do it?